From Wikipedia
Open on Wikipedia
| Coenonympha california | |
|---|---|
| |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Clade: | Pancrustacea |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Order: | Lepidoptera |
| Family: | Nymphalidae |
| Genus: | Coenonympha |
| Species: | C. california
|
| Binomial name | |
| Coenonympha california Westwood, 1851
| |
Coenonympha california, also known as the California ringlet or common ringlet, is a species of butterfly native to North America.[1][2] Although it has previously been considered a subspecies of Coenonympha tullia, genetic testing suggests it is a separate species.[3]
Habitat and behavior
[edit]C.california is typically found in fields, upland pastures, open foothill woods, and temperature grasslands. [4]Certain limited populations have evolved to flourish in specialized, ecologically constrained settings, moving away from generic grasslands. The stability and survival of target population depend heavily on habitat quality, which is determined by the availability of local resources and environmental elements like sheltering.[5]
Life Cycle and Reproduction
[edit]The life cycle of Coenonympha california goes through significant variation depending on geographic location, altitude, and subspecies. In habitats at higher elevations, populations may be univoltine, producing just one brood anually, depending on local climate.[6] Oppositely, populations in lower-elevation, warmer or southern locations are usually bivoltine, giving birth to two different broods per year. The second brood in bivoltine populations usually appears in the late summer after the first one flies in the spring.[6]
In contrast to the buff-colorred summer brood, the adult butterflies of the spring brood frequently exhibit darker and grayer colors.[7] This phenotypic plasticity may help with thermoregulation during the colder spring temperatures. Wolbachia bacteria, a reproductive parasite that causes cytoplasmic incompatibility and can quickly change the genetic makeup of populations across multiple broods, can also have a significant impact on reproduction and gene flow in these populations.[7]
Dietary Adaptations
[edit]Standard meadow grasses are the primary food source for the larve of C. california, but highly confined subspecies have developed unique nutritional needs to endure harsh conditions. The physical characteristics of the host plants, such as dense tussock growth forms, can significantly improve larval survival in related Coenonympha populations by offering vital shelter during overwintering periods. [6][7]
Morphology and Appearance
[edit]Extreme phenotypic variation across several geographic ranges and subspecies populations characterizes Coenonympha califonia's wing shape.[5] The wings' dorsal ground color varies, ranging from mild ochre, deep orange-orche, yellow, and pale/white. An inconsistent presentation of submarginal eyespots, called ocelli, on the ventral hind wings closely correspond with this mutation. Some butterflies can have many well-developed, dark ocelli within a single location, or they can have none at all. [6]Additionally, the species exhibits localized intergradation, where characteristics like eyespot count and ground color create wide, continuous geographic clines instead of distinct morphological boundaries between nominal subspecies.[5]
Species Status and Genetics
[edit]The C.california was formerly considered a subspecise of the Holarctic Coenonympha tullia. However, North American populations are not the sister group of Eurasian C.tullia, according to molecular phylogenetic analysis. [8] The recognition of C.california as a unique, distinct species peculiar to North America was made possible by this profound genetic diversity.[9]
Due to the great levels of genetic variation in wing patterns, including dorsal ground color and ventral eyespot expression, the taxonomy of C.california is infamously complicated.[7] Numerous subspecies within its range have previously been described as a result of this physical variety, including C.c.benjamini, C.c. eryngii, C.c. eunomia, and C.c. ampelos. Genetic research examining contact zones in areas like northern California have not discovered any meaningful genetic boundaries or reproductive isolation between many of these formal subspecies, despite these striking morphological distinctions. [7] The genomic data clearly suggest widespread morphological intergradation and ongoing gene flow, rather than rigid divides.
Taxonomy
[edit]Coenonympha california contains the following subspecies:
- Coenonympha california mcisaaci[2]
- Coenonympha california galactinus[2]
- Coenonympha california benjamini[2]
- Coenonympha california mackenziei[2]
- Coenonympha california yontocket[2]
- Coenonympha california eryngii[2]
- Coenonympha california eunomia[2]
- Coenonympha california columbiana[2]
- Coenonympha california mono[2]
- Coenonympha california elko[2]
- Coenonympha california pseudobrenda[2]
- Coenonympha california subfusca[2]
- Coenonympha california furcae[2]
- Coenonympha california nipisiquit[2]
- Coenonympha california ampelos[2]
- Coenonympha california ochracea[2]
- Coenonympha california insulana[2]
- Coenonympha california inornata[2]
- Coenonympha california california[2]
References
[edit]- ^ "NatureServe Explorer 2.0". explorer.natureserve.org. Retrieved 2023-03-16.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t "Common Ringlet (Coenonympha california)". iNaturalist. Retrieved 2023-03-15.
- ^ Zhang, Jing; Cong, Qian; Opler, Paul A.; Grishin, Nick V. (6 November 2020). "Genomic evidence suggests further changes of butterfly names" (PDF). The Taxonomic Report of the International Lepidoptera Survey. 8 (7). eISSN 2643-4806. ISSN 2643-4776.
- ^ Dennis, Roger L.H. (1997). "Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Muller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat qualtiy matters as much as patch size and isolation". Journal of Insect Conservation. 1: 167–176.
- ^ a b c Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa; Simonsen, Thomas J.; Bromilow, Sean; Wahlberg, Niklas; Sperling, Felix (2013-11-25). "Deceptive single‐locus taxonomy and phylogeography: Wolbachia‐associated divergence in mitochondrial <scp>DNA</scp> is not reflected in morphology and nuclear markers in a butterfly species". Ecology and Evolution. 3 (16): 5167–5176. doi:10.1002/ece3.886. ISSN 2045-7758. PMC 3892326. PMID 24455146. Archived from the original on 2020-02-02.
- ^ a b c d Dennis, Roger L.H.; Eales, Harry T. (1997-09-01). "Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Muller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation". Journal of Insect Conservation. 1 (3): 167–176. doi:10.1023/A:1018455714879. ISSN 1572-9753.
- ^ a b c d e Porter, Adam H. (1989). "A New Subspecies of Coenonympha Tullia (Muller)(Nymphalidae:Satyrinae) Confined to the Coastal Dunes of Northern Califonia". Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society. 43 (3): 229–238.
- ^ Geiger, Hansjurg (January 20, 1988). "Genetic and phenotypic population structure of the Coenonympha tullia complex (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae:Satyrinae) in California: no evidence for species boundaries". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 66.
- ^ Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa; Wahlberg, Niklas (2009). "Phylogeny and biogeography of Coenonympha butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) – patterns of colonization in the Holarctic". Systematic Entomology. 34 (2): 315–323. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3113.2008.00453.x. ISSN 1365-3113.
.svg){kind=icon} | This article related to members of the insect order Lepidoptera is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by adding missing information. |